Bridging the CORE Framework with Design Thinking
6 min read

Traditional methods of teaching and learning are increasingly being challenged by more dynamic and student-centered approaches. One such approach is Design Thinking, a methodology that originated in the fields of design and product development but has since been adapted to a wide range of disciplines, including education. The CORE Instructional Design Framework—Concise, Organized, Relevant, and Engaging—aligns closely with the principles of Design Thinking, particularly as practiced by leading institutions and thought leaders in the field. When these two powerful frameworks are combined, they can transform how educational content is created, delivered, and experienced.
Understanding Design Thinking in Education
Design Thinking is a human-centered approach to problem-solving that emphasizes empathy, ideation, prototyping, and testing. It’s a process that encourages creativity and innovation while keeping the end-user—in this case, the student—at the center of the design process. Design Thinking typically follows five key stages:
- Empathize: Understand the needs, experiences, and challenges of the students.
- Define: Clearly articulate the problem you are trying to solve.
- Ideate: Generate a wide range of ideas and solutions.
- Prototype: Develop tangible solutions or prototypes to test your ideas.
- Test: Experiment with your prototypes, gather feedback, and refine the solutions.
These stages are iterative, meaning that feedback and learning continuously inform each step, leading to a more refined and effective outcome. For more on the principles of Design Thinking in education, you can explore resources like the Harvard Graduate School of Education's Design Thinking page (opens in a new tab), as well as comprehensive guides such as those from the Designing Schools organization here (opens in a new tab) and the University of Texas at Austin here (opens in a new tab).
How the CORE Framework Aligns with Design Thinking
The CORE framework and Design Thinking both prioritize the user experience, focusing on creating solutions that are not only effective but also intuitive, engaging, and meaningful. Here’s how each element of the CORE framework connects with the principles of Design Thinking:
Concise: Simplifying Complexity
In both Design Thinking and the CORE framework, simplicity is key. The Concise pillar of the CORE framework emphasizes the importance of delivering content that is clear and to the point, removing unnecessary complexity that can overwhelm or confuse students.
Connection to Design Thinking:
In the empathize stage of Design Thinking, designers strive to understand the user’s needs and pain points. One common user need is clarity—students often struggle when faced with overly complex or dense material. By applying the Concise principle, educators can simplify content without diluting its value, making it easier for students to absorb and retain information. This approach aligns with the UX (User Experience) principles of reducing cognitive load and enhancing usability, which are central to the design thinking process.
For additional insights and tools to implement these ideas, IDEO’s Design Thinking Toolkit offers practical strategies that align with the Concise pillar of CORE here (opens in a new tab).
Organized: Creating Intuitive Structures
The Organized pillar of the CORE framework focuses on structuring content in a logical and coherent manner, ensuring that learners can efficiently navigate the material. This aligns with the Define stage of Design Thinking, where the problem is articulated clearly, and the solution is structured around that problem.
Connection to Design Thinking:
In Design Thinking, creating an intuitive structure is essential for developing prototypes that users can easily understand and interact with. Similarly, in education, well-organized content helps students to build upon their prior knowledge and see how different concepts are interconnected. By applying organizational principles, educators can create a learning path that feels intuitive and natural to students, much like a well-designed product or interface in UX design. This not only improves comprehension but also enhances the overall learning experience.
For further reading on how to integrate organization into Design Thinking pedagogy, consider reviewing Design Thinking in the Classroom (opens in a new tab).
Relevant: Ensuring Meaningful Connections
Relevance is crucial in both the CORE framework and Design Thinking. The Relevant pillar ensures that content is directly applicable to students' needs and real-world scenarios, making learning more engaging and meaningful.
Connection to Design Thinking:
In the Ideate stage of Design Thinking, designers generate ideas that are grounded in the user’s context and needs. In education, this translates to creating content that students can relate to and apply in real-life situations. By making learning relevant, educators can foster a deeper connection between the student and the material, similar to how a product or service must resonate with its users to be successful.
Books like Design Thinking in Play: An Action Guide for Educators provide valuable insights on how to keep content relevant while applying design thinking principles in the classroom. You can find more about this approach here (opens in a new tab).
Engaging: Fostering Active Participation
The Engaging pillar of the CORE framework is about capturing and maintaining students' interest throughout their educational journey. In Design Thinking, the Prototype and Test stages involve creating and refining solutions that users find engaging and effective.
Connection to Design Thinking:
In Design Thinking, engagement is critical to the success of a prototype. Testing with real users allows designers to see how their solutions are received and make necessary adjustments. In education, engaging content encourages students to actively participate in their learning, rather than passively consuming information. By incorporating interactive elements, hands-on activities, and opportunities for reflection and feedback, educators can create a dynamic learning environment that mirrors the iterative nature of Design Thinking. This process not only enhances learning outcomes but also ensures that the content resonates with students on a personal level.
Applying CORE and Design Thinking in Educational Practice
When combined, the CORE framework and Design Thinking offer a powerful approach to instructional design. Here are some practical ways to integrate these methodologies:
- Empathize with Your Students: Begin by understanding the diverse needs, challenges, and motivations of your students. Use surveys, interviews, or observation to gather insights that will inform the design of your course.
- Define the Learning Objectives: Clearly articulate the problems your course will address and the outcomes you aim to achieve. Ensure that the objectives are aligned with the needs identified during the empathize stage.
- Ideate with Flexibility: Brainstorm a range of ways to deliver content, considering different formats, technologies, and activities that could make the material more engaging and relevant. Encourage collaboration among faculty members to generate diverse ideas.
- Prototype Your Course: Develop a prototype of your course or a specific module. This could be in the form of a detailed outline, a storyboard, or a mock-up of an online module. Use the CORE framework to guide the development process, ensuring that the content is concise, organized, relevant, and engaging.
- Test and Refine: Pilot your course with a small group of students or colleagues and gather feedback. Use this feedback to make iterative improvements, just as you would refine a product in Design Thinking. Consider using A/B testing to compare different approaches and determine what works best.
Conclusion: Innovating Education Through CORE and Design Thinking
The intersection of the CORE framework and Design Thinking offers a roadmap for educators who want to innovate and improve their teaching practices. By focusing on the student experience, simplifying complexity, organizing content effectively, ensuring relevance, and fostering engagement, educators can create learning environments that are not only effective but also transformative.
Just as designers at IDEO and educators at Stanford’s d.school use Design Thinking to create products and services that meet real human needs, educators can use the CORE framework and Design Thinking to develop educational experiences that truly resonate with students. By doing so, we can prepare learners not just to succeed academically, but to thrive in an increasingly complex and interconnected world.
References
- Harvard Graduate School of Education. (n.d.). Design Thinking (opens in a new tab). Retrieved from https://tll.gse.harvard.edu/design-thinking (opens in a new tab)
- Designing Schools. (n.d.). What is Design Thinking in Education? (opens in a new tab). Retrieved from https://designingschools.org/what-is-design-thinking-in-education/ (opens in a new tab)
- The University of Texas at Austin. (n.d.). Design Thinking Has a Pedagogy Problem – The Way Forward (opens in a new tab). Retrieved from https://designcreativetech.utexas.edu/design-thinking-has-pedagogy-problem-way-forward (opens in a new tab)
- IDEO. (n.d.). Design Thinking Toolkit for Educators (opens in a new tab). Retrieved from https://page.ideo.com/design-thinking-edu-toolkit (opens in a new tab)
- Spencer, J. (2019). Design Thinking in the Classroom: Easy-to-Use Teaching Tools to Foster Creativity, Encourage Innovation, and Unleash Potential in Every Student (opens in a new tab). Adams Media.
- Martin, J., & Roberts, C. (2021). Design Thinking in Play: An Action Guide for Educators (opens in a new tab). ASCD.
Originally published on C.O.R.E Framework.


