Skip to content
Dr. Russ L'HommeDieuDoctor of Physical Therapy, Educator, Speaker, Consultant
All writing

Weighing the Cost of Caring: Evaluating ROI in Healthcare Ed.

28 min read

Weighing the Cost of Caring: Evaluating ROI in Healthcare Ed.

Introduction: The Price of a Dream

Choosing a career is about more than passion; it’s also an investment. As the cost of education continues to soar, students and families increasingly ask: Is the financial sacrifice worth the return?

In higher education, the “return on investment” (ROI) of a degree is a powerful lens to examine this question. ROI in education compares what you put in (tuition, time, lost wages, loans) versus what you get out (salary, career opportunities, personal fulfillment). It’s not the only factor in a career decision, far from it, but ignoring it can leave graduates with heavy debt and limited means to repay it.

In this post, we’ll explore how to evaluate the ROI of professional education through one detailed case study: physical therapy (PT). We’ll compare PT’s education costs and early-career earnings with those of physician assistants (PAs), skilled trades (like electricians), and social workers – four paths with very different profiles.

I write not just as an analyst, but as a father and a practitioner: I’ve been a physical therapist for 35 years, and when my own daughter considered following in my footsteps, I encouraged her to look at the numbers closely.

What we found ultimately led her down a different path, and it opened my eyes to how crucial (and personal) ROI analysis can be.

My Story: A DPT Dad and a Career Crossroads

About 10 years ago, my daughter was looking to go to PT school. Naturally, she considered becoming a PT herself. Perhaps her interest came from watching me in my work. I had started with a practice in our home, and both my kids spent a lot of time in the practice. Maybe she saw my satisfaction in helping patients walk again, the bond with my clients, or the respect in our community. Part of me swelled with pride at the idea. But another part of me, the part that pays the mortgage, hesitated.

Over three decades, I had watched the cost of becoming a PT skyrocket while salaries in our field inched up only modestly (studentloanplanner.com (opens in a new tab) ,fifthwheelpt.com (opens in a new tab)).

The Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) has become the required entry-level degree (replacing the old Bachelor’s), adding more years of school and tuition (studentloanplanner.com (opens in a new tab)).

New graduates often faced six-figure loan balances, yet starting salaries were nowhere near that level (fifthwheelpt.com (opens in a new tab)). In short, the ROI of a PT education seemed to be shrinking.

It was a difficult conversation, but I felt I owed my daughter an honest appraisal. Together, we crunched the numbers. By that time, the median total cost of a DPT program was about $66,000 at a public university (in-state) and $113,000 at a private university, and that's just for the graduate program (s (opens in a new tab)tudentloanplanner.com (opens in a new tab)).

Many students also carry debt from undergrad; it’s not uncommon for new DPTs to graduate with $100–150k in loans between undergrad and grad school (fifthwheelpt.com (opens in a new tab)).

We estimated how those loans would translate into monthly payments. Even on a 10-year repayment plan with average interest, $100k in loans could mean paying around $1,150 a month, totaling over $139,000 paid back, including interest (and much more if stretched over 20–25 years). That kind of financial burden can feel like a mortgage, except you can’t live in your degree.

My daughter listened thoughtfully. She also researched other healthcare roles. After briefly considering biomedical engineering, she landed on becoming a Physician Assistant (PA). PAs also require a graduate degree, but usually a 2 to 2.5-year master’s program rather than a 3-year doctorate.

The tuition for PA school, while still hefty, averaged around $57k at public universities and $91k at private schools, somewhat lower than PT in many cases.

Crucially, the earning potential for PAs was higher. According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the median annual wage for physician assistants in 2024 was about $133,000 (hdfs.illinois.edu (opens in a new tab)), whereas for physical therapists it was about $101,000 (bls.gov (opens in a new tab)).

In other words, the typical PA earns roughly 30% more per year than a PT on average, despite often spending less time (and money) in school. Early-career data showed PAs breaking into six-figure salaries within their first few years of practice, whereas many new PTs started in the $60–75k (rangefifthwheelpt.com (opens in a new tab)) and only later might approach the higher end of the spectrum with experience.

Seeing those comparisons, I wasn’t surprised when my daughter ultimately chose PA school. She excelled in her program and today, five years into her career, she enjoys the kind of job flexibility and financial stability that validated our analysis. As a PA, she has worked in both clinical and non-clinical roles, starting in primary care, then cardiology, and finally transitioning into a tech company’s medical device division as a medical liaison.

This kind of breadth is something I quietly envy; physician associates/assistants have a broader scope of practice and more career mobility than we do in PT (forums.studentdoctor.net (opens in a new tab)).

A PA can switch from surgery to pediatrics to industry if they wish, whereas PTs are generally confined to rehabilitation services. My daughter’s PA degree opened doors to roles with higher earnings and more scheduling flexibility (no weekend clinic shifts unless she opts in!).

Meanwhile, I’ve seen some of my own PT colleagues struggle with burnout in physically demanding jobs and feel stuck due to fewer alternative paths. While I simply started my own practice 30 years ago, even that pathway seems increasingly difficult.

I’ll be honest: as a father and a lifelong PT, it was bittersweet. I love my profession deeply. It’s rewarding in ways money can’t measure, but I didn’t want my child to be burdened by debt or limited in opportunity if there was a better option.

As an educator at heart, I realized we need to start having these frank conversations with all students. So let’s broaden the scope and dig into the data on ROI for different professional paths, PT included.

Understanding ROI in Professional Education

What do we really mean by “return on investment” in education? In simple terms, ROI = (Benefits – Costs) / Costs, often expressed as a percentage or ratio. For an education, the costs include tuition and fees, books, living expenses during school (or the income you forego by being in school instead of working), and the interest on any student loans used to finance it. The benefits are typically measured in earnings, for example, your salary over a certain time frame after graduation. A positive ROI means the earnings sufficiently exceed the costs, justifying the investment, whereas a negative ROI means you might have been financially better off choosing a cheaper path (or not going to school at all).

However, calculating ROI for a career isn’t as tidy as for a stock investment. There are nuances: time frame (do we look at 5 years of earnings? 10 years? Lifetime?), non-monetary rewards (passion, job satisfaction, societal impact), and intangibles (networking, prestige of a degree, personal growth) that don’t show up on a spreadsheet. Importantly, a lower financial ROI doesn’t mean a career isn’t “worth it” in a broader sense. But given how student debt can shackle one’s life choices, ROI is a critical piece of the puzzle.

One rigorous way to assess education ROI is through Net Present Value (NPV) analysis. A 2018 study in the Journal of Physiotherapy did exactly this for PT and several other professions (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (opens in a new tab)).

The researchers compared the total costs of each education (including lost earnings during schooling) against the future earnings of that career, all adjusted to present dollars.

The findings were illuminating for PTs: at the typical debt level of around $86k for a new DPT graduate, the net value of a PT degree was indeed positive, but it was lower than the NPV for physician assistants, nurse practitioners, pharmacists, dentists, and physicians (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (opens in a new tab)).

In fact, in that scenario, a PT degree’s financial ROI was better than some fields like optometry or veterinary medicine, but significantly worse than many other advanced health professions (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (opens in a new tab)).

And if a PT student took on very high debt (say $150k or more), the ROI plummeted. At $150k debt, PT had a lower NPV than almost every other field analyzed except veterinary medicine and chiropractic (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (opens in a new tab)).

The authors concluded that physical therapy education is a good financial investment only up to a certain level of student debt, cautioning students to think carefully about how much they borrow (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (opens in a new tab)).

In plainer terms: if you can become a PT without an exorbitant debt load, you’ll likely see a modest financial return over your career – you will out-earn what you spent on school, albeit slowly. But if you have to pay top-dollar tuition (or finance living costs entirely on loans), the scales tip.

One striking comment from that study was that at debt levels above ~$200k, many PT grads would not be able to meet recommended loan repayment benchmarks at their salary (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (opens in a new tab)), and beyond ~$266k in debt, the lifetime financial advantage of having a DPT over just having a bachelor’s degree essentially disappears (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (opens in a new tab)).

That’s sobering. It means a PT who over-borrows could theoretically spend decades paying for a doctorate that doesn’t financially put them ahead of someone who stopped at undergrad – a clear sign of a poor ROI.

Comparing ROI: PT vs. PA vs. Trades vs. Social Work

Let’s widen the comparison to other fields. Below is a snapshot of key metrics for becoming a Physical Therapist (PT) versus a Physician Assistant (PA), a Skilled Tradesperson (electrician as an example), and a Social Worker (clinical social worker with MSW). These represent different education pathways – doctoral, master’s, vocational training, and master’s, respectively – with very different cost structures and pay scales.

ROI

To understand the return on investment (ROI) across different career paths, let’s look at four professions: physical therapy, physician assistant, skilled trades, and social work. Each requires a different level of education, carries different costs, and offers different earning potential after 5–10 years in the field.

Physical therapists (PTs) typically complete a bachelor’s degree followed by a three-year Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) program. The DPT alone can cost between $66,000 at public institutions and $113,000 at private ones, not including undergraduate costs. Many graduates carry over $100,000 in total debt. Early-career salaries often range from $65,000 to $75,000, with most PTs earning around $80,000 to $100,000 within 5–10 years. While the long-term income is solid, the high cost and long duration of schooling make for a slower financial payoff. ROI is reasonable, but only if debt is kept in check.

Physician assistants (PAs) complete a bachelor’s degree followed by a roughly 2.5-year master’s program. These programs typically cost $57,000 to $92,000. Most PAs graduate with less than $100,000 in debt and enter the workforce with strong earning potential. Many start around $90,000, and within 5–10 years, salaries typically rise to $100,000–$130,000. PAs also enjoy broad job flexibility and high demand, making for a strong and relatively quick ROI.

Skilled trades, such as electricians, usually require a vocational program or a 4–5-year apprenticeship. Trade school costs are low—typically $5,000 to $15,000—and many apprentices earn wages while they train. By the 5–10 year mark, electricians often earn between $50,000 and $80,000 annually, with a median near $71,000. Because of the low cost and early entry into the workforce, trades offer a very high early ROI. While long-term income may plateau below some graduate-level professions, trades provide financial stability faster and with much less debt.

Social workers, particularly those pursuing clinical roles, need a bachelor’s degree and a two-year Master of Social Work (MSW). Public MSW programs range from $30,000 to $60,000, while private ones can cost up to $80,000. Starting salaries often fall in the low $40,000s, growing to about $60,000 with licensure and experience. While the work is meaningful, the financial ROI is relatively low. Debt from graduate school can be hard to manage given the modest income, making social work a profession typically driven more by purpose than financial return.

In short, PAs tend to offer the strongest financial return among these options, with trades offering rapid early ROI and PTs requiring careful financial planning to ensure a reasonable payoff. Social work, while noble and essential, carries a high cost relative to salary, resulting in the weakest financial ROI among the four.

NPV

When evaluating the financial return of different career paths using Net Present Value (NPV) over 10 years, the physician assistant (PA) profession comes out on top. Despite requiring a graduate degree and moderate student debt (averaging $85,000), PAs earn high starting salaries—typically around $90,000—and enjoy strong job growth. This combination results in a 10-year NPV of approximately $487,529, making PA the most financially rewarding choice in this analysis.

Close behind is the skilled trade path, represented here by electricians. With very low education costs (around $10,000) and the ability to start earning after one year, electricians build financial momentum early. While their starting salaries are more modest (around $50,000), their lack of debt and early income give them a strong 10-year NPV of about $418,278. This supports the growing recognition that trades can offer excellent financial returns—particularly in the early years of a career.

Physical therapy (PT), on the other hand, presents a more mixed picture. With high education costs (around $110,000) and delayed earnings due to three years of graduate school, the 10-year NPV for PTs is approximately $260,170. While PTs eventually earn solid salaries (around $70,000 to start, increasing with experience), the long training period and substantial debt burden slow the financial payoff. ROI can still be positive, especially for those who attend lower-cost programs, but it’s clearly more sensitive to cost than some alternatives.

Lastly, social work (MSW) offers the lowest financial return of the four paths analyzed. With graduate education costs around $60,000 and lower starting salaries (typically $45,000), social workers see a 10-year NPV of about $221,598. Though this still reflects a net gain over 10 years, the margin is narrower, and the debt-to-income ratio is less favorable. For many entering social work, the decision is driven more by passion and a desire to serve rather than financial gain.

Conclusion: In purely financial terms, becoming a physician assistant offers the best ROI within 10 years, followed by electricians in skilled trades—largely due to low costs and early income. Physical therapy remains a viable option but requires careful financial planning to be worthwhile. Social work, while critically important to society, offers the weakest short-term financial return and may require alternative funding strategies (like loan forgiveness programs) to make it sustainable. This NPV approach highlights that career choice should balance both passion and pragmatism, especially when student debt is involved.

Sources: Occupational data from U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics and industry surveys; education cost data from accreditation and professional reports, studentloanplanner.com, (opens in a new tab) inspiraadvantage.com, (opens in a new tab) edvisors.com.

Looking at the table, a few patterns jump out:

  • Physician Assistants (PAs) tend to have the strongest financial ROI of these four. Their education, while costly, is shorter than a doctorate and leads to high-paying jobs in a growing field. My daughter’s experience reflects this: she was able to start earning a six-figure salary in her mid-20s, with a debt load she can reasonably manage. PAs also have versatile career opportunities – clinical practice in various specialties, administration, teaching, industry roles – which provides resilience and often the ability to seek higher-paying niches. From an ROI standpoint, the combination of moderate education cost + high salary + career flexibility is powerful.
  • Physical Therapists (PTs) have good but slower returns. Our field offers solid middle-class earnings (around $80–100k after some experience), but the upfront investment is large. Three years of lost earnings during school and potentially six-figure tuition costs mean that new PTs start their careers in a financial hole. One analysis found the debt-to-income ratio for new PT grads is roughly 200% – meaning the average new PT owes about twice their annual income in student loansresearchgate.net (opens in a new tab). (For comparison, new medical doctors often have a similar or higher ratio, but their income trajectory climbs much faster in subsequent years.) A new PT with, say, $120k debt and a $70k salary may have to devote a significant portion of their paycheck to loans for 10+ years. It’s worth noting, too, that while PT salaries do rise with experience, they don’t typically shoot up dramatically. The profession’s pay has historically only tracked about with inflationstudentloanplanner.com (opens in a new tab) – we don’t see the big jumps that, say, tech workers or physicians might. All this means the ROI for PT is highly sensitive to education cost. Choose a cheaper DPT program, live frugally, and your ROI can be decent. But if you attend an expensive private program or rack up big loans, the financial payoff of that degree may disappoint.
  • Skilled Trades like electricians illustrate an entirely different model: low educational cost, “earn while you learn,” and respectable wages. By the time a PT or PA has finished grad school, an apprentice electrician could have 5+ years of work experience, little to no debt, and perhaps a small nest egg. Within a decade, many tradespeople earn salaries in the ballpark of a new grad PT! (servicetitan.com (opens in a new tab)) For example, the median electrician’s wage (~$62k) is not far off entry-level healthcare salaries, and experienced electricians can earn $70k or moreservicetitan.com (opens in a new tab). Financially, the early ROI is excellent – there’s almost no down period. However, the trade-off comes in the form of physical labor intensity, injury risk, and sometimes a lower ceiling for earnings (unless one progresses to owning a business). That said, some tradespeople do extremely well, especially if they start their own companies. From an ROI perspective, trades often beat many college pathways in the first decade: one analysis found a tradesperson can be “ahead” of a bachelor’s degree holder by well over $100k in net earnings within five years of the latter’s graduation (genesiscareer.edu (opens in a new tab)).

Over a lifetime, college graduates on average still earn more, but it can take many years to catch up when you factor in the debt and late start of a lengthy education (fifthwheelpt.com (opens in a new tab)). This is a reminder that the value of starting to earn sooner (and avoiding debt) is huge in ROI calculations.

  • Social Work (MSW) is a case where the non-financial rewards often drive the career choice. Financially, it’s challenging: master’s-level social workers frequently have debt comparable to teachers or counselors, but starting salaries that are modest. With a median pay around $60kbls.gov (opens in a new tab), it can be difficult to rapidly pay off even a $50k loan, especially on public-sector or non-profit salaries. Social workers often pursue Income-Based Repayment or Public Service Loan Forgiveness to manage loans – helpful programs, but an indicator that traditional ROI is not strong. Does that mean social work isn’t “worth it”? Not at all – society desperately needs these professionals, and many find the personal fulfillment outweighs the smaller paycheck. But it underscores our theme: students should enter such fields with eyes open about the financial aspect. If you’re passionate about social work, you might strategize to keep costs down: attend an affordable MSW program, work part-time, apply for loan forgiveness. In ROI terms, minimize the denominator (cost) since the numerator (pay) will be limited.

To sum up, physical therapy sits somewhere in the middle of these examples. It’s neither a fast financial payoff like some tech jobs or certain healthcare roles, nor purely a labor-of-love like some public service careers can be. For PTs, it’s crucial to maximize the personal and professional rewards (which are plenty) while managing the financial side smartly.

Why Colleges Don’t Always Help with ROI Analysis

You might be wondering: if ROI is so important, why don’t colleges and professional programs put these comparisons front and center? In theory, universities should want students to make informed decisions. In practice, however, there are structural disincentives that often keep ROI discussions in the background:

  • Enrollment and Revenue Pressures: Most colleges (and individual programs) are funded by tuition dollars. Highlighting that a particular degree has a poor financial payoff could directly hurt their enrollment. For example, physical therapy schools in the early 2000s pushed for the mandatory DPT doctorate partly for professionalization, but it also meant students paying for an extra year or more of tuition (studentloanplanner.com (opens in a new tab)).
  • Schools certainly didn’t advertise that “you’ll pay more for the DPT but salaries aren’t rising accordingly.” On the contrary, marketing materials often emphasize intangible benefits (knowledge, leadership, following your passion) rather than “you’ll make X dollars.” There’s nothing wrong with promoting the intrinsic value of education, "college is more than job training", but the result is that financial outcomes can be glossed over.
  • A candid ROI analysis might deter students from expensive programs, and that’s not in the financial interest of the institution. As one financial analyst quipped about DPT programs, “Schools won’t discuss the real motivation (revenue) behind making the DPT mandatory”(studentloanplanner.com (opens in a new tab)). Harsh, perhaps, but there’s truth there.
  • Lack of Data or Transparency: Until fairly recently, it was actually hard for students to find reliable data on how graduates of specific programs fared financially. Colleges weren’t required to disclose detailed earnings by major. (This is starting to change with initiatives to track outcomes, but it’s uneven.) Without transparent data, it’s difficult for any one advisor to guide a student on ROI. Many career centers stick to generic advice and avoid talk of money beyond general salary surveys. Moreover, some fields don’t have clear salary trajectories – e.g., social work incomes can vary widely by geography and sector. That uncertainty makes it easier to focus on qualitative aspects than hard numbers.
  • Philosophical Resistance: There is also an ideological component. Educators sometimes resist the notion of viewing education in “transactional” terms like ROI, fearing it frames college as only worth its paycheck. They’ll correctly argue that education has civic, personal, and intellectual merits that a salary can’t capture. While that’s true, it doesn’t negate the reality that students are investing real dollars (often borrowed) and deserve to know what the financial outlook is. We can value enlightenment and pragmatism at the same time. Still, because of this mindset, many faculty or administrators shy away from ROI talk, implicitly sending the message that “it will work out somehow,” which isn’t always the case.
  • Bureaucratic and Incentive Misalignment: In universities, the people who recruit students (admissions, program directors) are rarely the ones who handle the fallout of graduates struggling with debt – that falls to the students themselves and maybe financial aid offices. Colleges historically have faced little accountability for whether their graduates can repay loans. This is changing via policy tools (e.g. “gainful employment” regulations aimed at weeding out programs with poor debt-to-earnings outcomes), but many programs still skate by without scrutiny. Thus, institutions haven’t had strong incentives to incorporate ROI analysis into student advising. In fact, some lobbied against efforts to publish program-level ROI data, fearing it would scare students off certain (majorshbs.edu (opens in a new tab)).

This leads to a disconnect: students and families are largely left to research the ROI on their own. In my case, it took my personal industry experience and some deep-dive research to guide my daughter. Many aren’t so lucky – they may only realize later that, say, a for-profit grad school left them with enormous debt and a salary too low to manage it. That’s why it’s vital for independent sources (think tanks, government websites, professional associations) to step in with data and for educators to encourage students to do the math as part of their decision process.

The True Cost of Student Debt: Compounding and Stress

We’ve talked about tuition and debt figures, but it’s worth zeroing in on how financing magnifies cost. When you take out student loans, you’re not just paying tuition – you’re also committing to paying interest to the lender. Interest is essentially the fee for borrowing, and it can compound (accumulate) over time if not paid down. The longer you take to repay, the more interest piles up, and the more your education ultimately costs in total.

Consider a newly minted physical therapist with $100,000 in federal student loans – not an uncommon scenario. Suppose these loans carry a weighted interest rate around 6–7% (typical for graduate loans). If the PT sticks to the standard 10-year repayment plan, they’ll end up paying on the order of $40,000 in interest on top of the $100k principal【37†output】. In other words, the $100k borrowed results in ~$140k paid. If they opt for an extended 20-year repayment to ease monthly cash flow, the interest could balloon to $85k+ over the life of the loan【38†output】. That means nearly doubling the sticker price of their education once interest is accounted for.

Now, factor in that many grads don’t pay off loans in a straight line – some use income-driven plans that can extend 20-25 years, some go into deferment during residency or further training, etc. The costs can compound even more. Financing charges are the silent killer of ROI. They turn a pricey degree into a very pricey degree by the time all is said and done. This is why I often advise students: if you must borrow, borrow as little as possible, and have a plan for repayment. A $50k loan might be manageable; a $150k loan can be a life-altering burden.

There’s also the human side: debt isn’t just a financial number, it’s an emotional weight. Research on health professions students shows that high debt correlates with stress, delayed life milestones (like buying a home or starting a family), and even career choices (e.g., a indebted PT might feel forced to take a higher-paying job at a large clinic rather than the pediatric rehab job they actually wanted, or a social worker might forgo an important but low-paid community job to work in a better-paying hospital role) (researchgate.net (opens in a new tab)).

I saw in the survey by Ambler (2020) that over half of new PTs said their student debt influenced their job decisions (researchgate.net (opens in a new tab)) – in other words, they weren’t purely free to follow their passion; the loans steered them. That’s happening across professions: the compounding cost of education isn’t just dollars, it’s in choices and well-being.

Beyond Dollars: ROI as One Tool, Not the Only Tool

By now, you might think I’m arguing that everyone should just become an investment banker or software engineer – something with the highest paycheck-to-tuition ratio – and call it a day. Not so! I want to emphasize that ROI isn’t the only reason to choose a career, and it shouldn’t be.

We all know of teachers, artists, social workers, or even physical therapists who chose their path out of a calling or passion. Fulfillment, interest, talent, making a difference – these matter tremendously. No spreadsheet can tell you what your heart feels.

For me, despite recognizing PT’s financial challenges, I have zero regrets devoting my life to it. I’ve touched countless lives, and the meaning I derive from my work is priceless. My daughter saw that growing up; she ultimately found a different route in healthcare that, happily, she also finds rewarding.

Everyone’s values are different. If your dream is to be a social worker, then by all means pursue it. My wife is a social worker and she makes a real difference in people's lives. If you decide to be a social worker, go in with a clear plan: know the costs, minimize debt, and adjust expectations. ROI is a powerful tool to make informed decisions, not to dictate your dreams.

Think of ROI as a compass, not a mandate. It can point out if a particular path might lead to financial strain, allowing you to prepare or perhaps modify your route (for instance, choosing a less expensive school or seeking scholarships). It can also illuminate alternatives you might not have considered. In my daughter’s case, looking at ROI brought PA into the picture when PT was the only role we had initially imagined. For another person, it might highlight that becoming an electrician or an ultrasound technician could lead to a solid income without the debt of a four-year college – and that might be exactly the right fit for their goals and circumstances.

Ultimately, the goal is to avoid unpleasant surprises. If you knowingly choose a low-ROI path because it’s your passion, you’ll at least be prepared for the financial hurdles. That’s a world apart from blindly entering a costly program and feeling shocked and regretful later when the loan bills arrive.

Making Informed Decisions: Strategies and Resources

So, how can students and educators bring ROI analysis into career planning in a productive way? Here are some actionable strategies and resources:

  • Research Salary and Job Outlook Data: Before committing to any program, spend time looking up credible salary stats and employment projections. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Occupational Outlook Handbook is a great starting point (it provided many of the numbers in our table). It gives median wages and job growth forecasts for hundreds of occupations (hdfs.illinois.edu (opens in a new tab)bls.gov (opens in a new tab)). Professional associations often conduct salary surveys (e.g., the AAPA for PAs reported a $127k median salary in 2023 (aapa.org (opens in a new tab))). Know not just the starting salary, but also the likely range 5, 10, 20 years in – some fields have steep growth, others plateau early.
  • Tally the Full Cost of Education: Don’t stop at tuition when calculating costs. Include program fees, living expenses, books, exam and licensing fees, and the interest you might pay on loans. If you have an acceptance letter, the school’s financial aid office can often provide a cost of attendance breakdown. For graduate and professional programs, also consider the opportunity cost of not working during those years (fifthwheelpt.com (opens in a new tab)). For instance, three years in PT school is three years you won’t be earning a salary and that lost income is part of your investment. Some online calculators (like those on FinAid.org or Student Loan Planner) allow you to project loan payoff scenarios, which can be eye-opening.
  • Compare Alternatives Side by Side: If you’re torn between two paths – say, an MSW vs. a Mental Health Counselor, or PA vs. Nursing, or college vs. trade – do a side-by-side comparison similar to what we did above. Make a simple chart of cost vs. benefit. Sometimes, seeing the numbers juxtaposed brings clarity. You might discover, for example, that a nurse practitioner program has similar costs to a PA program but slightly lower median pay, affecting ROI. Or that an MBA at one school would cost twice as much as at a state school, but won’t necessarily raise your salary enough to justify the difference.
  • Seek Out ROI and Debt Statistics: There are now reports and tools that rank or evaluate programs by ROI. For instance, Georgetown University’s Center on Education and the Workforce has published analyses of the ROI of different colleges and majors over time. The Foundation for Research on Equal Opportunity (FREOPP) did a study showing that around 30% of higher ed programs leave students with negative ROI (especially many grad programs) (freopp.or (opens in a new tab)g) This is a striking statistic that can help you identify pitfalls. The U.S. Department of Education’s College Scorecard website is another valuable resource: it provides data on median earnings and median debt of graduates by field of study at many universities. You can look up, say, “Physical Therapy – XYZ University” and see what graduates typically earn and owe. Use these tools to inform your expectations.
  • Consider Financial Aid and Commitment Programs: ROI isn’t just fixed by the field you choose – how you finance it matters too. A field with a borderline ROI can become viable if you secure a scholarship or loan forgiveness. For example, if you feel called to social work or primary care medicine, look into programs like Public Service Loan Forgiveness (which forgives federal loans after 10 years of nonprofit/public service work) or National Health Service Corps scholarships (which fund tuition for people who commit to work in underserved areas). Reducing the debt principal through grants, employer tuition assistance, or working part-time during school can drastically improve your personal ROI outcome. Essentially, try to maximize “free money” and minimize debt. Every dollar you don’t have to borrow is a dollar (plus interest) you won’t have to repay later.
  • Talk to Professionals and Mentors: Qualitative insight is important too. Speak with people who are 5–10 years ahead in the career you’re considering. Ask how they feel about their financial situation relative to the cost of their training. A frank conversation with a young PT, PA, electrician, or social worker can reveal a lot about typical loan balances, lifestyle, and whether they feel their education was “worth it.” They might also share creative strategies they used, or mistakes to avoid. As one Student Doctor Network member bluntly put it in a discussion comparing careers: “Volunteer or shadow in each field... I could give you pros/cons, but only you can decide what you can see yourself doing for 30+ years.”forums.studentdoctor.net (opens in a new tab) Hearing the lived experience behind the numbers helps balance cold ROI logic with personal fit.
  • Embrace a Plan, Not Doom and Gloom: If you conclude that your chosen field has a weaker financial ROI, don’t be discouraged – make a plan. This might include living frugally during school to reduce loans, choosing a lower-cost institution over a prestige name, or committing to a higher-paying sub-specialty for a few years post-grad to knock out debt aggressively. For instance, a newly graduated DPT might choose to work in a lucrative travel therapy or sports clinic role for five years to save up, even if their long-term passion is pediatric neuro-rehab (which pays less). After clearing some debt, they can afford to transition to the lower-paying dream job without financial strain. In other words, you can sequence your career in a way that maximizes ROI early, then pivots to passion later.

Finally, I encourage higher education practitioners (advisors, faculty, administrators) reading this to thoughtfully incorporate ROI into student guidance. It can be done in a warm, empathetic way that respects students’ aspirations. We never want to crush dreams, but we do want to empower dreamers to achieve their goals sustainably. That means openly discussing the financial realities and encouraging due diligence. Students shouldn’t feel ashamed for asking “What will my salary be?” or “How long will it take to pay off these loans?” – those are wise questions. As my story illustrates, such questions can lead to better decisions and, ultimately, fulfilling careers that are both personally and financially rewarding.

Conclusion: Knowledge is Power (and ROI is Part of the Knowledge)

When my daughter decided not to pursue physical therapy, I had mixed emotions. I worried I had steered her away from my profession out of my own financial anxieties. But now, seeing her thrive as a PA, free from the extra burdens she might have had as a PT, I’m grateful we took the ROI conversation seriously. It was an act of love and pragmatism. And it didn’t diminish her passion for healthcare; it just channeled it into a path where she could flourish with less hardship.

The lesson isn’t “become a PA” or “avoid PT” – it’s do the homework for whichever path you consider. Higher education today is a profound investment. By evaluating the return on that investment, you’re not reducing education to dollars; you’re respecting your own future. You’re saying: I value my passion enough to plan for it wisely. Whether you’re a student contemplating your next step or an educator guiding someone along, remember that every career has multiple currencies of value – fulfillment, impact, and yes, financial stability. ROI is simply one of those currencies, and understanding it will help you strike the right balance for you.

In the end, the goal is a career that sustains you in every sense of the word. Armed with facts, self-awareness, and support, you can choose a path that not only feeds your soul but also pays the bills. And when you achieve that balance – when your investment in yourself truly pays off – that’s a return no one can take away.

AI Collaboration Disclosure

This article was created with the support of generative AI tools used to structure and synthesize research findings. However, the ideas, conclusions, and critical interpretations expressed herein are entirely original and reflect the author's unique perspective, experience, and academic judgment.

References:

Originally published on C.O.R.E Framework.

Keep reading

  • Is It Worth It? Why Speak-Up Culture Takes Two Conditions, Not One Poster
    • The Science of Caring Well

    Is It Worth It? Why Speak-Up Culture Takes Two Conditions, Not One Poster

    6 min read

    Before anyone raises a concern, they quietly ask two questions: Is it safe? and Is it worth it? A poster answers neither. A look at the research behind speak-up culture, the four quadrants of voice and silence, and why the answer is the only thing leaders actually control.

  • The Care Equation: Why Better Care Starts With Better Questions
    • The Science of Caring Well

    The Care Equation: Why Better Care Starts With Better Questions

    5 min read

    Quality of care is proportional to the quality of your questions, multiplied by how often you ask, raised to the power of the integrity of your answers. A walk through the equation — and why honest answers are the exponent that amplifies everything else.

  • Technology Is a Substrate
    • The Science of Caring Well

    Technology Is a Substrate

    3 min read

    The same device can enable compassion or extinguish it, and the difference is never settled in the silicon. Six questions — for leaders, clinicians, students, prescribers, and builders — about where moral responsibility for technology actually sits.